
AI Psychosis Is Real, and I've Seen It Before
The executives rushing to replace workers with AI agents remind me of the automation fever dreams I watched crash and burn in the '90s.
Crédito de imagen: Image via MIT Technology Review — AI. Used under fair use for news commentary. · source
Look, I've been watching executives lose their minds over automation for longer than some of you have been alive. And what's happening right now with AI? It's got a familiar smell to it.
Aaron Levie, the Box founder, coined a term that's been rattling around in my head since I read it: "AI psychosis." According to TechCrunch, Levie's point is that the people deciding AI can replace your job are the ones least likely to understand what your job actually involves. And I'll be honest, that's about the most accurate diagnosis of corporate decision-making I've heard in years.
When I was at Kuka, we had a similar wave of enthusiasm around the late '90s. Every manufacturing exec wanted to be the guy who automated everything. Full lights-out factories. No humans on the floor. I remember sitting in meetings where someone from purchasing, who'd never actually watched a welding cell run for eight hours, would ask why we couldn't just "let the robots handle" quality inspection. We'd explain the seventeen reasons why that was a terrible idea with 1997 sensor technology, and they'd nod along, then ask the same question three months later.
The difference now is that the fever has spread beyond manufacturing. ClickUp just cut 22% of its workforce to make room for AI agents. TechCrunch reports that tech layoffs in 2026 are already nearly matching all of 2025, and we're not even halfway through the year. That's not a measured response to new capabilities. That's panic buying in reverse.
Here's the thing that bothers me most. I've actually deployed automation that works. Real robots doing real tasks that humans genuinely shouldn't be doing, repetitive motions that destroy shoulders and backs, work in environments that aren't safe for people. That's the good stuff. That's what automation should be. But what I'm seeing now is something different. It's executives who've played with ChatGPT for twenty minutes deciding that their customer service team is obsolete. It's boards reading McKinsey reports about AI productivity gains and demanding headcount reductions before anyone's actually tested whether the AI can do the job.
Cobertura relacionada
More in Industrial
The Apple supplier priced its shares at the maximum and still had to turn away demand, which tells you something about where hardware money is flowing right now.
James Chen · 25 Jun · 5 min
Prime Day deals on Echos and Ring cameras are fine, but let's not confuse consumer gadgets with the serious robotics work happening in warehouses.
Robert "Bob" Macintosh · 25 Jun · 3 min
Amazon's CEO made his first India trip and left behind a $13 billion AI commitment and an aggressive quick-commerce expansion. The numbers are real. The execution is the hard part.
James Chen · 25 Jun · 6 min
A wave of arXiv preprints this week tackles one of manipulation's oldest problems: how do you get a robot to learn from imperfect, incomplete, or just plain missing data?


